What are some examples of new technology that have failed?

What are some examples of new technology that have failed?
What are some examples of new technology that have failed?

Certainly! Over the years, there have been numerous technological innovations that, despite their initial promise, failed to gain traction or meet expectations. Here are some notable examples:

  1. Google Glass: Launched with much fanfare in 2013, Google Glass was a pair of smart glasses with an optical head-mounted display. While it was a technological marvel, concerns about privacy, high costs, and a lack of clear use-case led to its decline in the consumer market.
  2. Segway: Introduced in 2001, the Segway was a two-wheeled, self-balancing personal transporter. Despite predictions that it would revolutionize personal transportation, its high price point, regulatory challenges, and safety concerns limited its widespread adoption.
  3. Microsoft Zune: Microsoft’s answer to Apple’s iPod, the Zune was a digital media player launched in 2006. Despite its features, it couldn’t compete with the iPod’s popularity and was discontinued in 2011.
  4. HD DVD: This high-definition optical disc format was developed to be the successor to the standard DVD. However, it lost the format war to Blu-ray and was eventually discontinued.
  5. Amazon Fire Phone: Launched in 2014, Amazon’s Fire Phone was the company’s attempt to enter the smartphone market. Despite its unique features like “Dynamic Perspective” and “Firefly”, it couldn’t compete with established players like Apple and Samsung.
  6. Betamax: Developed by Sony in the 1970s, Betamax was a video cassette recording technology. It was technically superior to its rival, VHS, but due to various factors including cost, recording length, and licensing issues, VHS became the dominant format.
  7. Nokia N-Gage: Released in 2003, the N-Gage was Nokia’s attempt to combine a mobile phone with a handheld gaming system. Its awkward design and lack of quality games led to its downfall.
  8. BlackBerry PlayBook: Launched in 2011, the PlayBook was BlackBerry’s entry into the tablet market. It faced criticism for lacking essential features at launch, such as native email, calendar, and contacts applications.
  9. 3D Televisions: While 3D movies gained popularity in theaters, the push to bring 3D technology to home televisions in the 2010s didn’t see the expected uptake. The need for special glasses and a lack of 3D content were among the reasons for its limited success.
  10. Palm Foleo: Announced in 2007, the Foleo was a subnotebook companion to Palm’s smartphones. It was criticized for its limited functionality and high price, leading to its cancellation before it even hit the market.

These examples serve as a reminder that even with significant financial backing and marketing, not all technological innovations resonate with consumers or meet market needs. Factors such as timing, competition, usability, and societal acceptance play crucial roles in the success or failure of new technologies.

What are some lessons we can learn from these failures?

Absolutely, technological failures offer invaluable lessons that can guide future innovations and strategies. Here are some key takeaways from the aforementioned technological missteps:

1. Understand Market Readiness:

  • Lesson: Just because a technology is groundbreaking doesn’t mean the market is ready for it. Google Glass, for instance, was a technological marvel, but societal concerns about privacy and its practical utility were not adequately addressed.

2. Prioritize User Privacy and Security:

  • Lesson: With the advent of wearable tech and IoT devices, user privacy and security have become paramount. Technologies that can potentially infringe on personal privacy, as seen with Google Glass, can face significant backlash.

3. Ensure Affordability and Accessibility:

  • Lesson: A product’s success isn’t solely determined by its features but also its accessibility to the broader public. Both Google Glass and Segway were priced at points that made them inaccessible to many potential users.

4. Collaborate with Policymakers:

  • Lesson: Technological innovations, especially those that redefine public spaces or norms (like the Segway), need to be in sync with regulatory frameworks. Working alongside policymakers can ensure smoother integration into society.

5. Safety is Paramount:

  • Lesson: Any technology, especially those that involve personal mobility like the Segway, must undergo rigorous safety testing. High-profile accidents or safety concerns can significantly tarnish a product’s reputation.

6. Recognize the Power of First-Mover Advantage:

  • Lesson: Entering a market dominated by a well-established player, as Microsoft attempted with Zune against Apple’s iPod, requires more than just matching features. There needs to be a compelling and distinct value proposition to sway loyal customers.

7. Focus on User Experience:

  • Lesson: A product’s design, usability, and overall user experience can make or break its success. Nokia’s N-Gage, for instance, suffered due to its awkward design, emphasizing the importance of user-centric design.

8. Avoid Rushing Products to Market:

  • Lesson: Releasing a product before it’s fully ready can be detrimental. BlackBerry’s PlayBook was criticized for lacking essential features at launch, highlighting the dangers of rushing a product to market without thorough testing.

9. Stay Updated and Adaptable:

  • Lesson: The rapid pace of technological evolution means that products can quickly become obsolete. Staying informed about industry trends and ensuring products are adaptable to future advancements is crucial.

10. Clear Market Positioning is Essential:

  • Lesson: Products that don’t fit clearly into established categories or fail to communicate their unique value can struggle. Palm’s Foleo, for instance, suffered from unclear market positioning.


Failures, as much as successes, shape the trajectory of technological innovation. By understanding and learning from past mistakes, companies and innovators can better navigate the complex landscape of technology, ensuring that their products not only meet market needs but also stand the test of time.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments